Buku Hamil

Buku Hamil
Buku Cara Cepat Hamil

Friday, May 14, 2010

Alangkah Lucunya Negeri Ini

Alangkah Lucunya Negeri Ini - Strength of the parties who want to weaken the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) through the criminalization of KPK leaders, thus still considered strong.

One effort to weaken the strength of the evidence the Commission had, was granted pretrial litigation Anggodo Assessment Letter Discontinuing Prosecutions (SKPP) Bibit Samad Rianto KPK leaders, and Chandra M Hamzah.

The statement expressed member of the House of Representatives Commission III Jamil Nasir in the discussion entitled "Seed-Chandra Drama Volume II" in Jakarta, Saturday (24 / 4). "The strength weakens the KPK is still running. So powerful parties who want to dwarf the KPK," he said.

According to Nasir, a victory over SKPP Seeds Anggodo-Chandra actually cause confusion for the public. It should, he said, this need not happen if the rule of law in an independent state. He considered, a continuing case-law of Chandra Seeds like a slapstick law.

"It's like the joke of law, no legal ketoprak, confused why people like this. How funny law enforcement in this country," he added.

According to him, weakening efforts to criminalize the Commission through his leadership, already apparent when discussing the Law of Special Court of Criminal Acts of Corruption (Corruption) in the Parliament. Nasir argues, there are certain parties who want the authority of KPK reduced.

Meanwhile, practitioners from the University of Indonesia Rudy Satrio said, waive the case in the public interest (deponering), from the side of the law requires proof of the strong.

"Many parties requested that the Attorney General chose the option deponering Seed-Chandra case, but such options do not seem to be chosen, because apparently the Attorney General has no reason to choose it," said Rudi.

Therefore, he said, deponering case from a legal standpoint, there must be strong evidence. But in this case, Rudy rate, there is evidence that does not reveal the missing link. Given this missing link, he said, the Attorney General can not prove guilt Seed-Chandra. "From Ari Muladi to the Commission, who penyampainya, who the Commission who receives, it's important evidence," he explains.

General Chairman of Indonesian Advocates Association (Peradi) Otto Hasibuan judge, in issuing policies SKPP Attorney on the case Seed-Chandra, is inappropriate. Should be, said Otto, Attorney deponering option.

"I agree it can be stopped. If it stopped there was the principle of opportunity. Deponering Attorney General could choose, waive the case is in the public interest," he said.

According to Otto, the prosecutor had stated that the file has been incomplete Seed-Chandra (P21) and proven. So the most appropriate is the case is put aside in the public interest. "Because of insufficient evidence, it must be put aside this case," he said further. With disregard for public interests, continue to Otto, then the interests of all parties, either the Attorney General and Seed-Chandra, have been accommodated in it. So no longer will be the case in question by certain parties concerned. "It has become the authority of the Attorney General in the public interest, we can not fuss," she added.

No comments:

Post a Comment